{"id":561,"date":"2023-11-04T23:44:26","date_gmt":"2023-11-04T22:44:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aphr.ifil.uz.zgora.pl\/?p=561"},"modified":"2023-11-04T23:47:44","modified_gmt":"2023-11-04T22:47:44","slug":"a%cf%86r-at-the-twelfth-polish-congress-of-philosophy-in-lodz","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.aphr.ifil.uz.zgora.pl\/?p=561","title":{"rendered":"A\u03a6R at the Twelfth Polish Congress of Philosophy in \u0141\u00f3d\u017a"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

In September (11th-16th) 2023 the 12th Polish Congress of Philosophy took place in \u0141\u00f3d\u017a. Three members of A\u03a6R took part in this great event, and they delivered four papers there. Tomasz Mr\u00f3z spoke about three traditions of doing philosophy and three interpretations of Plato at the ancient philosophy section, and the other three papers were presented in the section of Polish philosophy: on the influence of Aristotle on the works of W. Tatarkiewicz (Adrian Habura); on H. Jakubanis’ arguments for the reneval of philosophy in accordance to its ancient roots (Mariam Sargsyan); and on B. Kieszkowski, a researcher of Renaissance Platonism, on his life, works and their reception (again T. Mr\u00f3z).<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

T. Mr\u00f3z’s paper, Three Traditions of Doing Philosophy and Three Interpretations of Plato<\/em>, was devoted to presenting three Plato scholars of the turn of the 20th century, Paul Natorp (1854\u20131924), a German, Paul Shorey (1857\u20131934), an American, and Wincenty Lutos\u0142awski (1863\u20131954), a Pole, and their interpretations of Plato. Mr\u00f3z attempted to relate these three personalities of one generation and their Platonic studies with their native, dominant philosophical traditions: neo-Kantianism, Emersonian tradition and Polish Romantic Messianism. Their methodologies, views on the chronology of the dialogues and the status of ideas were discussed, as a starting point for future comparative research of their Platonic studies and reciprocal references.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

M. Sargsyan\u2019s presentation was titled: Arguments of Henryk Jakubanis (1879-1949) for Renewal of Philosophy and Culture on the Ancient Model<\/em>. It started with an introductory part about the biography of Jakubanis to familiarise the audience with his personality. Then the main part followed and it consisted in discussing Jakubanis’ work The Significance of Ancient Philosophy for the Modern View of the World<\/em> (1910). Historical and philosophical research methods of Jakubanis were analysed and compared with those of his academic supervisor in Kyiv, Alexei Gilarov. Another comparative perspective was provided by the works of Tadeusz Zielinski, who was an internationally recognised scholar, and a kind, older colleague for Jakubanis.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

A. Habura’s paper was titled Aristotle in the Works of W\u0142adys\u0142aw Tatarkiewicz<\/em> and divided into two parts. In the first one, following Tatarkiewicz’s own statement, Habura distinguished two “images” of Aristotle’s philosophy which Tatarkiewicz had developed during his research career. Habura took into account various works of Tatarkiewicz and demonstrated that these two images were not contradictory, but rather complementary to each other. In the second part of his presentation Habura distinguished five aspects of Aristotle’s inspiration in Tatarkiewicz’s works, in accordance with Tatarkiewicz’s own reflection on this topic, and proved a significant, substantial and lasting impact of Aristotle on Tatarkiewicz’s original philosophical investigations.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

Second paper by Mr\u00f3z was a presentation of a further development of his research on Bohdan Kieszkowski, a Polish scholar who was a specialist on Renaissance Platonism and Pico della Mirandola. Earlier this year<\/a> Mr\u00f3z discussed Kieszkowski’s biography, but this time the focus was on Kieszkowski’s works and their reception, that is, his polemic with another Polish expert in Renaissance philosophy, M. Heitzman (1899-1964), on the sources of Renaissance Italian Platonism, and a critical reception of Kieszkowski’s edition of Pico’s Conclusiones <\/em>(1973) by a Portuguese researcher, Jos\u00e9 Vitorino de Pina Martins (1920-2010). Heitzman searched for the roots of philosophy in Florentine Academy in medieval thought, while Kieszkowski tended to emphasise the role of ancient sources. As for Pina Martins, he praised Kieszkowski’s erudition, yet pointed to a large number of errors in Conclusiones<\/em>, resulting from various reasons, including Kieszkowski’s lack of precision in reading Latin texts.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"
J.V. de Pina Martins with Pico’s portrait<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In September (11th-16th) 2023 the 12th Polish Congress of Philosophy took place in \u0141\u00f3d\u017a. Three members of A\u03a6R took part in this great event, and they delivered four papers there. Tomasz Mr\u00f3z spoke about three traditions of doing philosophy and three interpretations of Plato at the ancient philosophy section, and the other three papers were … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[190,199,47,93,203,215,90,116,11,219,175,207,115,81,71,152,82,218,5,170,56,214,202,4,135,220,6,69],"class_list":["post-561","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-talks","tag-190","tag-a-gilarov","tag-a-habura","tag-aristotle","tag-b-kieszkowski","tag-florence","tag-germany","tag-h-jakubanis","tag-in-polish","tag-j-v-de-pina-martins","tag-kyiv","tag-m-heitzman","tag-m-sargsyan","tag-messianism","tag-neo-kantianism","tag-p-natorp","tag-p-shorey","tag-pico-della-mirandola","tag-plato","tag-platonism","tag-poland","tag-r-w-emerson","tag-renaissane","tag-t-mroz","tag-t-zielinski","tag-united-states","tag-w-lutoslawski","tag-w-tatarkiewicz"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.aphr.ifil.uz.zgora.pl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/561","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.aphr.ifil.uz.zgora.pl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.aphr.ifil.uz.zgora.pl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.aphr.ifil.uz.zgora.pl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.aphr.ifil.uz.zgora.pl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=561"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"http:\/\/www.aphr.ifil.uz.zgora.pl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/561\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":575,"href":"http:\/\/www.aphr.ifil.uz.zgora.pl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/561\/revisions\/575"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.aphr.ifil.uz.zgora.pl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=561"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.aphr.ifil.uz.zgora.pl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=561"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.aphr.ifil.uz.zgora.pl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=561"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}