{"id":952,"date":"2025-12-01T06:53:00","date_gmt":"2025-12-01T05:53:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aphr.ifil.uz.zgora.pl\/?p=952"},"modified":"2025-12-01T09:47:53","modified_gmt":"2025-12-01T08:47:53","slug":"philosophy-in-zielona-gora-an-anniversary","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.aphr.ifil.uz.zgora.pl\/?p=952","title":{"rendered":"Philosophy in Zielona G\u00f3ra. An Anniversary"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

This year, Institute of Philosophy, University of Zielona G\u00f3ra (UZ), where Ancient \u03a6ilosophy Reception research group is affiliated, celebrates its 30th anniversary. Among the variety of events, there was a conference<\/a> on 23rd-24th October, devoted to the problem of co-operation in its various relations to theory, history and philosophical practice. A\u03a6R’s history at UZ is obviously much shorter, but two of its representatives actively participated in the conference.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

Mariam Sargsyan was the first of them. In her presentation she discussed the results of her doctoral studies at UZ and her dissertation, successfully defended<\/a> earlier this year. She focused on analyses of Henryk Jakubanis\u2019 (1879-1949) historical-philosophical legacy, which consists of three main parts: 1) his work on Empedocles and its methodology; 2) Plato in his (partly unpublished) writings; 3) his views on ancient and modern ways of doing philosophy. Moreover, Sargsyan presented the conclusions of her research on intellectual genealogy of Jakubanis\u2019 thought.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"
Dr. Vadym Tytarenko, Dr. Iryna Liashchenko, Dr. M. Sargsyan, Prof. Taras Kononenko.<\/sup><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

What was even more significant was the fact that Ukrainian participants (see the photo above) of the conference, who work at the National University of Kyiv, attended Sargsyan’s presentation on Jakubanis, who had studied and worked in Kyiv a century ago. They were very interested in her results and provided valuable feedback that could be helpful in improving the text of her doctoral thesis before it is published. The discussion between them demonstrated how important it is to confront different points of view on one subject which is researched by scholars from different countries, applying various methods and interested in different aspects of the history of philosophy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The second conference participant from A\u03a6R was Adrian Habura who delivered a paper on W\u0142adys\u0142aw Tatarkiewicz (1886-1980) and his reflection on social aspects of human happiness. Habura discussed Tatarkiewicz’s definition of happiness and his understanding of human life, then he examined the role of the others in individual happiness and the links between human individual and society in their relations to happiness. In his paper Habura developed a general view on the role of society in Tatarkiewicz\u2019s philosophical and ethical considerations contained in his book Analysis of Happiness<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

Although Habura’s paper was not directly devoted to the reception of ancient philosophy in Tatarkiewicz\u2019s writings, the following discussion allowed him to address this issue. He highlighted some similarities and differences between Aristotle\u2019s and Tatarkiewicz\u2019s understandings of happiness and convincingly demonstrated how Aristotle could have inspired ethical investigations of this Polish philosopher, whose doctoral thesis on Aristotle was composed under supervision of the Marburg neo-Kantians.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

This year, Institute of Philosophy, University of Zielona G\u00f3ra (UZ), where Ancient \u03a6ilosophy Reception research group is affiliated, celebrates its 30th anniversary. Among the variety of events, there was a conference on 23rd-24th October, devoted to the problem of co-operation in its various relations to theory, history and philosophical practice. A\u03a6R’s history at UZ is … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[266,47,93,177,116,130,299,11,175,115,5,56,297,300,186,298,69,221],"class_list":["post-952","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-talks","tag-266","tag-a-habura","tag-aristotle","tag-empedocles","tag-h-jakubanis","tag-happiness","tag-i-liashchenko","tag-in-polish","tag-kyiv","tag-m-sargsyan","tag-plato","tag-poland","tag-society","tag-t-kononenko","tag-ukraine","tag-v-tytarenko","tag-w-tatarkiewicz","tag-zielona-gora"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.aphr.ifil.uz.zgora.pl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/952","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.aphr.ifil.uz.zgora.pl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.aphr.ifil.uz.zgora.pl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.aphr.ifil.uz.zgora.pl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.aphr.ifil.uz.zgora.pl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=952"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"http:\/\/www.aphr.ifil.uz.zgora.pl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/952\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":969,"href":"http:\/\/www.aphr.ifil.uz.zgora.pl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/952\/revisions\/969"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.aphr.ifil.uz.zgora.pl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=952"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.aphr.ifil.uz.zgora.pl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=952"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.aphr.ifil.uz.zgora.pl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=952"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}